Serious issues - not a rhetorical analysis
essay
This is not an agree/disagree with the article
essay
This is not merely an explanation of the
article
You should not be arguing for (or against) the
author’s position
Put thesis at end of introduction.
Thesis should evaluate the persuasiveness of
the article and suggest a focus for your analysis (e.g. The article is somewhat
persuasive because of its strong logos and weak pathos).
Present a thorough summary of the article that
reflects its structure as well as its content. (Make this your second
paragraph.)
In your body paragraphs discuss specific
examples of the author’s use of each rhetorical appeal. Explain how each
example demonstrates the appeal. Say logos, pathos, and ethos. Be specific and
thorough. If you’re saying the author uses credible sources, identify the
specific sources; say why you find them credible, etc. If you’re saying
something in the article evokes emotion, say what emotion it evokes (this is
not the same as the author expressing emotion, which may or may not evoke the
reader’s emotions). The best discussions of logos explained the logical steps
of the author’s argument (cause-effect, comparison, etc.) rather than just
listed the facts presented in the article. if you want your essay to be more
persuasive, discuss more examples!
Maintain focus on rhetorical analysis. Don’t
add your own evidence/reasons to bolster author’s argument. Don’t cheerlead for
the argument. Avoid injecting your own opinion of the topic into your analysis;
save that for your conclusion.
Begin each body paragraph with a topic sentence
that sums up the point of your paragraph. Don’t begin a body paragraph with a
quote.
Small things:
Article titles in quotes;
newspapers/magazines/Web sites in italics/underlined
Don’t call author by his/her first name. It’s
not professional.
Put quotation marks around all word-for-word
quotes!
No comments:
Post a Comment